The Decline of General Electric (GE) Stock – Lessons You Can Learn

November 20, 2017  |  

The Decline of General Electric (GE) Stock – Lessons You Can Learn

Key Takeaways

  • Over the past 90 years, the majority of individual stocks (58%) have failed to outperform one-month Treasury bills.
  • Maintaining a well-diversified portfolio of low-cost investments will substantially increase your odds of building a secure financial future—something individual stock pickers can’t claim.

Investors in General Electric (GE) stock aren’t happy right now. This week the company cut its dividend by 50 percent. This decision added insult to injury because GE’s stock has dropped more than 40 percent over the last year. But, these results are more common than you might realize.

The purpose of this post is not to explain why GE’s stock is dropping so severely. Instead, it’s to urge you to use GE’s short-term stock woes as a cautionary tale to make you a smarter long-term investor. You see, investments in individual stocks can produce big winners at times, but also big losers.

Your brother-in-law or your friend at the club love to brag about the big winners they’ve had in the stock market. They rarely crow about their losers. Unfortunately, those winners become overrepresented in our minds. That’s a problem because it is very hard, if not impossible, to predict reliably which stocks will be winners and which will be losers.

This uncertainty is compounded by another challenge–the “Profit Concentration Issue.” The concentration issue was examined in recent research by Hendrik Bessembinder, a finance professor at Arizona State University.

Bessembinder’s study contained very important findings for investors in the stock market:

  1. Since 1926, just 4 percent of the stocks in the S&P 500 have accounted for virtually all of the wealth made by investors during that time.
  2. Three in five individual stocks (58%) since 1926 have failed to outperform one-month Treasury bills over their lifetime.
  3. The most common single result for an individual stock since 1926 has been a return of nearly negative 100 percent — almost a total loss.

Read those findings again and let them sink in.

The profit concentration issue means that investors have very little chance of picking long-term winners consistently. In fact, the odds are heavily stacked against them. Despite these results, some investors will continue to try to pick individual stocks for the same reason that folks play the lottery—they think they can win BIG despite the overwhelming odds against them.

I wish them luck.

The good news is that investors can increase their chances of having above average returns (returns better than the average investor) by broadly diversifying their portfolios in low-cost investments and by maintaining their portfolio’s allocation in a disciplined manner. This pragmatic investing strategy will rarely give you bragging rights at the club or Holiday dinner table. But, over the long run, you will probably be much better off financially than your golfing buddy or brother in law, the stock pickers.



1. Registration with the SEC should not be construed as an endorsement or an indicator of investment skill, acumen or experience. 2. Investments in securities are not insured, protected or guaranteed and may result in loss of income and/or principal. 3. This communication may include opinions and forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are opinions and/or forward-looking statements (including words such as “believe,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” and “expect”). Although we believe that the beliefs and expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such beliefs and expectations will prove to be correct. Various factors could cause actual results or performance to differ materially from those discussed in such forward-looking statements. 4. Historical performance is not indicative of any specific investment or future results. Views regarding the economy, securities markets or other specialized areas, like all predictors of future events, cannot be guaranteed to be accurate and may result in economic loss of income and/or principal to the investor. 5. Investment process, strategies, philosophies, allocations and other parameters are current as of the date indicated and are subject to change without prior notice. 6. Nothing in this communication is intended to be or should be construed as individualized investment advice. All content is of a general nature and solely for educational, informational and illustrative purposes.7. Any references to outside content are listed for informational purposes only and have not been verified for accuracy by the Adviser. Adviser does not endorse the statements, services or performance of any third-party author or vendor cited. 8. Unless stated otherwise, any mention of specific securities or investments is for hypothetical and illustrative purposes only. Adviser’s clients may or may not hold the securities discussed in their portfolios. Adviser makes no representations that any of the securities discussed have been or will be profitable.

Share this post

About Chas Boinske

Charles P. Boinske, CFA, is a 30 year investment management veteran overseeing the strategic direction and portfolio management process for Independence Advisors, LLC. Have a question for Charles? CLICK HERE TO ASK CHARLES

Get Free Updates

Enter your email address to receive our weekly updates! (we respect your privacy)

advanced-degrees cells curriculum faith faith-formation high-school-choice neumann-scholars quality-education recommend resources scholarship stream student-device student-retention visit activities student-life admission class-pages
%d bloggers like this: